<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel Atom N Series VS Z Series</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.netbookmarket.net/intel-atom-n-series-vs-z-series/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.netbookmarket.net</link>
	<description>Buy the latest and greatest Netbooks at the lowest prices!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 11:51:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fatih</title>
		<link>http://www.netbookmarket.net/intel-atom-n-series-vs-z-series/comment-page-1/#comment-1032</link>
		<dc:creator>Fatih</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbookmarket.net/?page_id=443#comment-1032</guid>
		<description>if you read comments on that website you&#039;ve taken the graph, you can see that there is no big performance difference between n and z series since after heavy load on z series, temperature rises and cpu throttles. speed goes down to 800 MHz insted of 1600. just read myvaiop&#039;s comment, 
http://www.yugatech.com/blog/personal-computing/intel-atom-z530-vs-atom-n270/#comment-266573</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you read comments on that website you&#8217;ve taken the graph, you can see that there is no big performance difference between n and z series since after heavy load on z series, temperature rises and cpu throttles. speed goes down to 800 MHz insted of 1600. just read myvaiop&#8217;s comment,<br />
<a href="http://www.yugatech.com/blog/personal-computing/intel-atom-z530-vs-atom-n270/#comment-266573" rel="nofollow">http://www.yugatech.com/blog/personal-computing/intel-atom-z530-vs-atom-n270/#comment-266573</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gagan</title>
		<link>http://www.netbookmarket.net/intel-atom-n-series-vs-z-series/comment-page-1/#comment-882</link>
		<dc:creator>Gagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 05:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbookmarket.net/?page_id=443#comment-882</guid>
		<description>This is not a fair comparison. To be so dismissive of the hardware video decoding in the GMA 500+Z_Atom is wrong. The difference in the newer chipset&#039;s ability to play back 720p or 1080i video with the CPU being at 20-30% is a huge plus!

On my N280+GMA 950 can BARELY playback a 720p mkv, it runs at 100% Cpu, drops frames... But I can play the same file at 20-30% cpu perfectly smooth on the z520+GMA500 netbook.

For other uses like surfing the web, word processing, etc. it&#039;s perfectly fast on Windows 7. If you are worried about benchmark tests or ripping audio/video buy a proper laptop with a core duo that can crunch the numbers.

Use a netbook for what it was meant for!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not a fair comparison. To be so dismissive of the hardware video decoding in the GMA 500+Z_Atom is wrong. The difference in the newer chipset&#8217;s ability to play back 720p or 1080i video with the CPU being at 20-30% is a huge plus!</p>
<p>On my N280+GMA 950 can BARELY playback a 720p mkv, it runs at 100% Cpu, drops frames&#8230; But I can play the same file at 20-30% cpu perfectly smooth on the z520+GMA500 netbook.</p>
<p>For other uses like surfing the web, word processing, etc. it&#8217;s perfectly fast on Windows 7. If you are worried about benchmark tests or ripping audio/video buy a proper laptop with a core duo that can crunch the numbers.</p>
<p>Use a netbook for what it was meant for!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indian</title>
		<link>http://www.netbookmarket.net/intel-atom-n-series-vs-z-series/comment-page-1/#comment-794</link>
		<dc:creator>Indian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbookmarket.net/?page_id=443#comment-794</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m ashamed of finding my fellow Indians repeatedly asking stupid questions and demand answers/solutions in every other forum or discussion board!

Glad am not finding any here!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m ashamed of finding my fellow Indians repeatedly asking stupid questions and demand answers/solutions in every other forum or discussion board!</p>
<p>Glad am not finding any here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entangledenigma</title>
		<link>http://www.netbookmarket.net/intel-atom-n-series-vs-z-series/comment-page-1/#comment-531</link>
		<dc:creator>Entangledenigma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbookmarket.net/?page_id=443#comment-531</guid>
		<description>Also plz tell me that how much cache is it with n280 and z530...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also plz tell me that how much cache is it with n280 and z530&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entangledenigma</title>
		<link>http://www.netbookmarket.net/intel-atom-n-series-vs-z-series/comment-page-1/#comment-530</link>
		<dc:creator>Entangledenigma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbookmarket.net/?page_id=443#comment-530</guid>
		<description>does that mean netbooks intended with 1366*786 resolution cant use n280 processor.r they restricted to use z series for high res and n series for low res....pleasssss explain this..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does that mean netbooks intended with 1366*786 resolution cant use n280 processor.r they restricted to use z series for high res and n series for low res&#8230;.pleasssss explain this..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohan</title>
		<link>http://www.netbookmarket.net/intel-atom-n-series-vs-z-series/comment-page-1/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 16:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbookmarket.net/?page_id=443#comment-347</guid>
		<description>Thanks, great information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, great information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious George</title>
		<link>http://www.netbookmarket.net/intel-atom-n-series-vs-z-series/comment-page-1/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbookmarket.net/?page_id=443#comment-335</guid>
		<description>Thank you, everyone has been waving their hands when it comes to discussing the N and Z series atoms usually stating the N is &quot;better&quot; without any kind of elaboration.  Just this little bit of information has helped me a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, everyone has been waving their hands when it comes to discussing the N and Z series atoms usually stating the N is &#8220;better&#8221; without any kind of elaboration.  Just this little bit of information has helped me a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
